Multi-column

Happiness Is an Activity: Nicomachean Ethics, Book I

Summary

summary::

Thoughts

Highlights

id858123062

Aristotle’s Methodology πŸ”—

id858123075

Aristotle is a dialectical thinker. He begins with an idea, he challenges it and complicates it, and then he reaches a conclusion. πŸ”—

id858123080

Every inquiry has an appropriate standard πŸ”—

id858123220

Ethical inquiry requires experience, so the young struggle to do it well πŸ”—

id858123774

We must begin with what we know πŸ”—

id858123926

We start with endoxa and then proceed dialectically to a result. πŸ”—

id858123929

Finding the Good πŸ”—

id858123984

Every art and every inquiry, and similarly every action and every choice, is held to aim at some good. Hence people have nobly declared that the good is that at which all things aim.
See what Aristotle is doing here: he is marking a leap in the inference with that phrase β€˜Hence people have nobly declared.’ But he won’t stop there. He will go on to argue for a few claims:

  1. That all actions aim at some good

  2. That all actions aim ultimately at the good, which is a singular thing

  3. That the good is happiness (eudaimonia)

  4. That happiness is an activity of the soul in accord with virtue πŸ”—

id858124021

All actions aim at some good πŸ”—

id858124026

Aristotle speaks here of teleology. When we say that an action (or art, inquiry, etc.) aims at some good, we are speaking of its goal or its end. πŸ”—

id858124247

All actions aim at the good πŸ”—

id858124832

There needs to be some single good which sits atop the hierarchy, or else when we aim at some good we would never actually reach it β€” there would always be a further good to be preferred that we had not yet reached. πŸ”—

id858124835

The good is happiness πŸ”—

id858125245

We know happiness is valued above all else because we choose other things in order to be happy, and we do not choose happiness in order to achieve other ends β€” we just value happiness. πŸ”—

id858125249

Happiness is an activity of the soul in accord with virtue πŸ”—

id858125260

We moderns treat happiness a lot like pleasure, and this is not what Aristotle means. Happiness is instead a kind of life β€” you are flourishing and living well. We call this eudaimonia. πŸ”—

id858125296

The final definition we get from Aristotle is that happiness is an activity of the soul in accord with virtue. This is important: it is not just virtue, but rather the activity of acting virtuously by one’s own will. To do that is to live well, to flourish, to be happy. And that is the end of human life. πŸ”—

id858125364

what are human beings uniquely capable of? Find that, and describe a human doing it well, and we will be close to a description of virtue, and thus on our way to theory of happiness, and thus on our way to a theory of the best human life. πŸ”—

id858125368

Political and Contemplative Lives πŸ”—

id858125391

Two kinds of lives are mentioned favorably: the life of politics and the life of contemplation. Politics is an art which must coordinate all other arts, and so it is perhaps the highest art. But is it better to be a political beast or to live a life of contemplation? πŸ”—